10:43 pm last names, policy, research

While the economic stats published by Linden Lab have been frozen (see JIRA WEB-948 ), the SLNameWatch bot has been indicating something different. Sometime in the last two weeks, more than 430,000 accounts have disappeared from the in-world search. Last names that previously had a consistent number of residents under them, query after query, for 1.5 years, suddenly have seen their usage count reduced by as much as 50%.
There is a pattern. Most of the affected last names were opened and closed before SLNameWatch.com was founded. The remainder are from a pool that was opened in late 2007. Therefore, I speculate that only the oldest of Second Life’s accounts, perhaps those without a valid email or with very long dormancy, have been intentionally purged.
The frozen 16.8 Million figure may be closer to accurate than the 17.0million figure daily registration trends would predict. At the moment I am counting 16.5m residents. I don’t know what the economic stats page will say when they flip the switch back on over at LL. It depends on when it comes back. Expect a steady 13,700 new accounts per day. This means it will take about 30 days for new accounts to fill this deficit. Maybe LL will turn the economic stats page back on when the total residents figure returns to increasing territory, or about February 17.
–Big Adz ))

9 Responses
  1. Adz Childs :

    Date: February 2, 2009 @ 10:00

    The number of accounts disappearing from search has now exceeded 1/2 million, more than 3% of all accounts with heritage names.

  2. Adz :

    Date: February 3, 2009 @ 07:44

    The number has now exceeded 600,000.

  3. Adz Childs :

    Date: February 7, 2009 @ 20:49

    838,884 disappeared…

  4. Dusan Writer’s Metaverse » Linden Lab Purges Nearly a Million Accounts :

    Date: February 15, 2009 @ 00:50

    […] Adz points out that around the same time as the Second Life economic statistics went silent coincides with a […]

  5. Adz Childs :

    Date: February 15, 2009 @ 07:24

    912,667 …

  6. Adz Childs :

    Date: February 17, 2009 @ 09:09

    1,071,451 …

  7. Adz Chils :

    Date: February 20, 2009 @ 07:28

    1,524,596 …

  8. Adz Childs :

    Date: February 22, 2009 @ 09:37

    1,848,132 …

  9. Adz :

    Date: February 23, 2009 @ 09:33

Leave a Comment

Your comment

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.